Legal Opinion
Cascadia Wildlands v. Eugene Water & Electric Board
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 2, 2025No. 6:25-cv-00446Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CASCADIA WILDLANDS; WILLAMETTE Case No. 6:25-cv-00446-MTK RIVERKEEPER; OREGON WILD and NATIVE FISH SOCIETY, AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs, v. EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD, Defendant. KASUBHAI, United States District Judge: Cascadia Wildlands, Willamette Riverkeeper, Oregon Wild, and Native Fish Society (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action pursuant to Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. 16 U.S.C. § 1538. Before the Court are (1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF No. 25) and (2) Plaintiffs’ Motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.