Legal Opinion
United States v. Foster
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided January 30, 2007No. 06-0238/NAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge ERDMANN
delivered the opinion of the court.
Personnelman First Class Richard C. Foster entered a plea of not guilty to two specifications of committing indecent acts with a child on divers occasions and one specification of communicating a threat, all in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2000). At the close of the Government’s case, the military judge dismissed one of the indecent act specifications on the grounds that the evidence was factually insufficient. The panel convicted Foster of the remaining two specifications and sentenced him…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. QuintanillaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. BirdsallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. ArruzaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. SkidmoreU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. HarveyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. MerrittUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
- United States v. FrantzUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.