Rouse v. Albany Insurance Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
According to plaintiff’s allegations, he operated a dry cleaning plant in a one-story, masonry building located at 205 East Caswell Street in Kinston. Each defendant issued its separate policy containing the “C” Stock Coverage clause set out in the statement of facts. Each policy contained a provision that in case the plaintiff had other valid insurance any loss should be apportioned. By reason of the apportionment clauses in the policies, the presence of both insurers before the court is necessary for the court properly to apportion the loss and to fix the liability of each insurer.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- M. Pretzfelder & Co. v. Merchants' InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Williams v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Paul v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Redmon v. Netherlands Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Highlands Insurance Co. v. City of Galveston Ex Rel. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Hudiburg Chevrolet, Inc. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Folger Coffee Co. v. Great American Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1971
- McBroome-Bennett Plumbing, Inc. v. Villa France, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.