Legal Opinion

Paul v. Dixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1959No. 91PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

Decisions of this Court hold that where all the defendants join in a demurrer to the complaint upon the ground that it does not set forth a good cause of action, the demurrer will be overruled if the complaint sets forth a good cause of action as to any one of the defendants. Conant v. Barnard, 103 N.C. 315, 9 S.E. 575; Loughran v. Giles, 110 N.C. 423, 14 S.E. 966; Blackmore v. Winders, 144 N.C. 212, 56 S.E. 874; Caho v. N & S Ry. Co., 147 N.C. 20, 60 S.E. 640; Hipp v. Farrell, 169 N.C. 551, 86 S.E. 570; Winders v. Southerland, 174 N.C. 235, 93 S.E. 726.

See also McIntosh’s N.C. P & P, Sec.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Bailey v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Hipp v. . FarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Caho v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Loughran v. . GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Williams v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Schmidt v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Rouse v. Albany Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Ridley v. JIM WALTER CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API