F. J. Kress Box Co. v. Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The court below having found that the establishment of an incinerator plant, with the most approved appliances, and its normal operation, including the convergence of wagons bearing garbage, is not a nuisance per se, and there being evidence upon which to base that finding, following our usual rule in cases of alleged nuisances, the decree must be affirmed. If the operation of the plant does, become a nuisance in fact, appellants have their remedy, either by a new proceeding or under the present bill, of which the court below will retain jurisdiction.
The other questions raised have…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gemmill v. CalderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Sheets v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kunz v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Lees v. Sampson Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Roberts v. Lower Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1952
- Dougherty v. Hazleton Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.