Legal Opinion
People v. Cefaro
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 1965PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
The defendants moved to .suppress the Polaroid camera mentioned in the indictment. A hearing was *991ordered. After the taking of testimony, the hearing was adjourned on two separate occasions to afford the District Attorney an opportunity to submit a memorandum of law. At the last appearance of the parties before the court, the District Attorney consented to the suppression sought by the defendants and the camera was thereupon ordered suppressed as evidence.
The trial of the defendants commenced last week before another Justice of this court and the People, by order to show cause, have asked to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Robert Williams and Henry WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- People v. Smith, New York County Courts1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. CefaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. IucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. FordNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. Angevine, New York County Courts1965
- People v. McDuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.