Legal Opinion
Davet v. MacCarone
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided October 8, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-0110 PPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PETTINE, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff brought this action against the City of Cranston, three police officers (Enrico Maccarone, Samuel Schlageter and Salvatore DeCesare), and Robert A. DiMeo, a civilian, and his corporation, Time Plating, Inc. Since the complaint includes a false arrest allegation, federal jurisdiction is premised on 42 U.S.C. § 1983; pendent to this case are state claims of malicious prosecution and false arrest.
I ruled that none of the officers were entitled to qualified immunity and directed a verdict for the plaintiff on all of the § 1983…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Anthony IndelicatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Irving Stolberg v. Members of the Board of Trustees for the State Colleges of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Melvin T. Smith v. Ferron C. LoseeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Vincent Milone v. Moceri Family, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard F. Davet v. Enrico MacCaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Russell Bolden v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Third-Party v. Transport Workers Union of Philadelphia, Local 234, Transport Workers Union of America/afl-Cio, Third-Party Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Aadland v. Boat Santa Rita II, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023