Saxlehner v. Wagner
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio. ■ ■ • The following is the opinion of the Circuit Court, by Thompson, District Judge: The bill shows that the complainant owns certain wells or springs in the city of Buda-Pesth, Hungary, the water of which possesses valuable medicinal properties, and that she sells this water, a bitter water, throughout the world under the trade-mark or trade-name of “Hunyadi…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio. ■ ■ • The following is the opinion of the Circuit Court, by Thompson, District Judge: The bill shows that the complainant owns certain wells or springs in the city of Buda-Pesth, Hungary, the water of which possesses valuable medicinal properties, and that she sells this water, a bitter water, throughout the world under the trade-mark or trade-name of “Hunyadi Janos,” and she complains: (1) That the defendants are wrongfully selling an artificial bitter water of their own manufacture…
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit brought by Emilie Saxlehner, the widow and successor of Andrew Saxlehner, the proprietor of the original spring at Buda-Pesth, in Hungary, which produces a bitter medicinal water to which he gave the name “Hunyadi Janos,” to enjoin Edward Wagner, William Wagner, and Sophia Wagner, makers and sellers, in Cincinnati, Ohio, of artificial waters, from manufacturing and selling an artificial water either under the name of “Hunyadi Janos” or “Hunyadi.” The court below granted an injunction restraining the sale of artificial bitter water under the name of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- French Republic v. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- City of Carlsbad v. SchultzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
- La Republique Francaise v. SchultzU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
- Thackeray v. SaxlehnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. G. Smith, Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Ta'ron, Inc., and International Fragrances, Inc. v. Chanel, Inc., and Chanel Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Dietz v. Horton Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Du Pont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
- Barnes v. PierceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908