Legal Opinion

Comcast Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 2011No. 2208 C.D. 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge BROBSON.

Presently before the Court is the appeal of Petitioner Comcast Corporation (Employer). Comcast challenges a decision by Workers’ Compensation Judge Irving L. Bloom (WCJ Bloom), which the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirmed, that Employer was not entitled to reimbursement from the Workers’ Compensation Supersedeas Fund (Fund). The party opposing the appeal is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (Commonwealth). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

Neither the procedural history nor the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Buckwalter v. Borough of PhoenixvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Robb, Leonard & Mulvihill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth, Bureau of Worker's Compensation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Phillips v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API