Gyles v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Judge.
Randall Gyles appeals an order entered by Superior Court Judge Milton M. Souter dismissing a post-conviction relief application in which Gyles claimed that he was unlawfully imprisoned because his parole had been unlawfully revoked. Specifically, Gyles asserted that the Alaska Parole Board lacked jurisdiction to revoke his parole and violated his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. We conclude that Gyles’ jurisdictional claim is meritless but that the superior court erred in summarily dismissing Gyles’ self-incrimination claim.
Randall Gyles was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. ImlayMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. James CranleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- In the Interest of E.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
- Diorec v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.