United States v. Darrell Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Darrell Coleman appeals the revocation by the district court 1 of his term of supervised release and the sentence of nine months that the court imposed upon him for violating the conditions of his release. We affirm.
Mr. Coleman challenges the district court’s order only on constitutional grounds, arguing that the logic of Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. - , 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), renders the United States Sentencing Guidelines unconstitutional as well as his nine-month sentence. Although the Supreme Court did hold the Sentencing Reform Act unconstitutional after the appellant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Lazaro Huerta-Pimental, AKA Jose HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rasheim CarltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ROBERT LOUIS SALTER, JR., DEFENDANT—APPELLANTCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Dominick Daniel NaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Kenton Eagle ChasingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.