Legal Opinion
United States v. Lazaro Huerta-Pimental, AKA Jose Huerta
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 2006No. 04-50037PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAEZ, Circuit Judge.
Huerta-Pimental appeals the revocation of his term of supervised release and the subsequent imposition of additional imprisonment for violating the conditions of release. Specifically, Huerta-Pimental asserts that the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his term of supervised release and to impose a new term of imprisonment because the original imposition of supervised release as a part of his sentence was unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. HaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States v. DeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. SantanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. WhitlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.