Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Amoun Sayaovong

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2014No. 2013AP001485-DPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. On March 14, 2014, referee Daniel L. Icenogle issued a report recommending that Attorney Amoun Vang Sayaovong be declared in default and that he be publicly reprimanded, as requested in the complaint filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). The referee also recommended that Attorney Sayaovong make restitution to one client and that he either promptly submit a second client matter to binding fee arbitration or make restitution to that client. The OLR filed a restitution statement indicating that the second client has died and asks that restitution be made to that client's heirs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Amoun Vang SayaovongWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re Amoun Vang SayaovongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Amoun Vang SayaovongWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eric L. CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API