Medrano v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARD, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction of murder. The jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. We reverse and remand.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged and the facts will be referred to only with the discussion of the grounds of error. Appellant’s first ground of error complains of the action of the trial court in overruling his motion to quash the indictment, in that the indictment failed to allege the instrument used to stab the deceased and that Appellant was not given notice of the particular offense…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
- DeLeon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Peña v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Medrano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
- Loera v. LoeraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.