Legal Opinion

Rent v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1992No. 1090-89PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of the offense of promoting obscene material and his punishment was assessed at five days confinement and a fine of $1,500. The conviction was reversed and remanded for new trial. Rent v. State, 771 S.W.2d 723 (Tex.App.— Dallas, 1989). We granted review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that appellant was entitled to ten days notice after the physical amendment of the information in this case and whether a harmless error analysis should have been conducted. See Article 28.10(a), V.A.C.C.P.

After…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sodipo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Rent v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Riney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Eastep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  5. Westfall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API