Wood v. Texas Ice & Gold Storage Co.

Counsel’s statement of the nature and result of the suit contained in appellant’s brief is not only clear and concise, but is accepted by counsel for appellee ns correct, and we accordingly adopt same. It follows:

“Appellant, a retail dealer in ice in the city of Dallas, sued appellee, a manufacturer of and wholesale dealer in said commodity, on a * * * contract entered into by the parties, whereby appellee agreed to sell appellant, at $3 per ton, ‘as much as six tons, or what his trade may demand, of ice per day,’ and as much more as appellee might be able to supply without conflicting with…