Legal Opinion

Nason v. Lord-Merrow Excelsior Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 1, 1942No. 3355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Before trial, the defendant moved that the plaintiff be required to elect between the two counts in his declaration. This motion was denied and the defendant excepted. The first count alleged the fact that the rolls were dull. The second count alleged a crack in the metal strap. As hereinafter appears, the two counts were not inconsistent, but rather supplemented each other. The motion was properly denied.

The plaintiff was injured while operating an excelsior machine in the defendant’s mill. The essential parts of this machine were the “plate” and the feed rolls. The plate, so-called,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Coughlin v. Arms Textile Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  3. Whitten Oil, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Avery v. ChapmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  5. Gardner v. Balcom Nashua Ice Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API