Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Erickson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1994No. 72667Published

1DissentJustice McMORROW

I dissent because I believe the defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to prove his allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel; defendant should not be barred from proving his allegations under the doctrine of waiver.

The defendant’s post-conviction petition raises a serious allegation that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to discover Weliczko’s allegedly fraudulent and perjured misrepresentation that Weliczko was a trained mental health provider qualified to testify regarding whether defendant suffered from a substantial emotional or mental disability. This…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. CaballeroIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. EddmondsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API