Legal Opinion

Scott Rose v. J.Z. and J.Z. (Adoptive Parents)

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2013No. 32A05-1207-AD-361Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. Mar 08 2013, 8:30 am PRO SE APPELLANT: Scott Rose Plainfield, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Scott Rose, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. 32A05-1207-AD-361 ) J.Z. AND J.Z., (Adoptive Parents), ) ) Appellees. ) APPEAL FROM THE HENDRICKS SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Robert W. Freese, Judge Cause No. 32D01-1102-AD-5 March 8, 2013 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snider v. GaddisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Goldsmith v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. JK HARRIS & CO., LLC v. SandlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Z.S. v. J.F.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API