Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 8, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdbN, J.

Are tbe legacies of stock contained in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of tbe will specific or general?

If they are general legacies the stock dividends would constitute a part of tbe general estate of tbe testator, and, after tbe administration of tbe estate, pass to tbe residuary legatees. If, upon tbe other band, tbe legacies are specific, tbe legatees named are entitled to said stock dividends by virtue of tbe fact tbat said stock dividends are accretions to tbe stock bequeathed by tbe testator. ' “Specific legacies carry with them all accessions by way of dividend or interest tbat may accrue…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kearns v. KearnsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
  2. Gordon v. JamesMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Perry v. . MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  4. Harper v. Bibb & FalknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
  5. Perry v. LeslieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Heyer v. BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Heyer v. . BulluckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Cuppett v. NeillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Shepard v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Shepard v. BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API