Legal Opinion

State v. Bratcher

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1919No. 21,932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*594The opinion of the court was delivered by

MASON, J.:

W. P. Bratcher was prosecuted upon a charge of burglariously entering a garage and stealing an Overland automobile worth $600. He was convicted of grand larceny, and appeals.

1. The defendant contends that the information was fatally defective and should have been quashed because it treated the combination of burglary and larceny as constituting a separate and distinct offense. To support this view reliance is placed upon cases which were reversed because of proceedings in the trial court based on that conception. (The State v. Mooney, 93 Kan.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  3. State v. MooneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. In re SpauldingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. State v. CountrymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. State v. FinleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. State v. EmorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. State v. BoltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API