Legal Opinion
Sanitary & Improvement District No. 384 v. Bruhns Packing Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1999No. S-97-1076PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
The landowner, Bruhns Packing Company (BPC), argues that the compensation it received for a temporary and permanent easement was inadequate because it was not allowed to introduce evidence concerning the loss of vegetation located on the condemned land and because the jury was specifically instructed to disregard any possible value such vegetation might have added to the fair market value of the land.
After trial, BPC filed a motion for attorney fees, expert witness fees, prejudgment interest, and costs. The district court failed to rule on this motion before BPC filed its notice…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SilversNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Gordon v. Community First State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- Thrift Mart, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Abboud v. PAPIO-MISSOURI RIVER DISTRICTNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Keller v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADSNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Salkin v. JacobsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Bailey v. Lund-Ross Constructors Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- US Ecology, Inc. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. HalfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Estate of PetersNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.