Legal Opinion

Darnell v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 21, 2002No. 87,483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J:

Chris Darnell appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Darnell contends he has received insufficient medical treatment in violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. We affirm.

The facts in this case are for the most part undisputed. Darnell is an inmate at the Lansing Correctional Facility (Lansing). He complains that he suffers from three medical conditions: (1) a lump on the side of his abdomen, which causes great pain; (2) bleeding in his stool when he defecates; and (3) ongoing stomach pain and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Berry v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Willie Smart v. Romeo Villar, Chief Medical Officer, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. WerholtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. Laubach v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
  4. Stolte v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
  5. Van Dyke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API