Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Henderson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Complaint by Henderson against Hiram H. Talbott, Trumbull G. Palmer, and Romania • Palmer, bis wife, alleging, in substance, that in 1837, and for a long time prior *298thereto, said Talbott was largely indebted to the plaintiff and others; that afterwards, the plaintiff’s claim against Talbott was reduced to judgment in one of the courts of California, on which execution was issued without avail; that Talbott has no property in his own name out of which the plaintiff’s claim can be realized; that Talbott, being the owner of a large amount of real estate in the State of Ioioa, and being possessed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frakes v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Findley v. CooleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1823

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bevins v. Cline's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Spaulding v. BlytheIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Willis v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. McCormick v. HyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Morgan v. HyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API