Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Hyatt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Complaint by the appellees, on two promis*561sory notes, alleged to have been made by the appellant, payable to William E. Dant, assigned by Dant to Henry Sehooley, and by Schooley to the appellees. The notes were secured by a mortgage on real estate. Prayer for judgment on the notes, and foreclosure of the mortgage.

Answer, trial by the court, finding and judgment for appellees.

In his motion for a new trial, the appellant assigned two causes:

1. That the decision is not sustained by the evidence, and is contrary to law;

2. Admitting the testimony of Nancy Dant, wife of the assignor of the notes and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Meni v. RathboneIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Gee v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. McConnell v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Stanley v. StantonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mannix v. State ex rel. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Meyer v. State ex rel. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hunt v. ListenbergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API