Legal Opinion

Burden v. Max-Mor Development Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In a proceeding under article 15 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law to determine adverse claims to a 22.5-acre parcel of land in the Town of DeWitt, Onondaga County, Special Term granted plaintiff’s (Burden) cross motion *1048for summary judgment and denied defendant’s, Max-Mor Development Co. (Max-Mor) similar motion upon a finding that when Max-Mor acquired the property in question it failed to comply with the provisions of section 6 of the Onondaga County Tax Act (L 1971, ch 1092, § 1). We agree. The property was previously owned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. All State Credit Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. London v. HammelNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Vivenzio v. City of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burnell G. Carney and Alice Carney, by L. David Zube, Chapter 11 Trustee v. James v. PhilipponeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Wiesniewski v. BasinaitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Sussman v. HendricksonNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Aronauer v. St. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Lily Dale Assembly, Inc. v. County of ChautauquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API