Legal Opinion
Sussman v. Hendrickson
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eli Wager, J.
The defendants in this action to compel the determination of a claim to real property (RPAPL art 15) seek an order vacating the default judgment which was entered against them on June 17,1983. The judgment decrees that the plaintiff (who had purchased a tax lien on defendants’ residence in February, 1979 for $650.43 and had been issued a tax deed on March 2, 1983), is the owner in fee simple and bars the defendants from any right, title or interest in the premises. An action to evict the defendants has been stayed by the District Court in order to give the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dunkum v. MacEck Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- County Securities, Inc. v. SeacordNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- People v. . LadewNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Stevens Medical Arts Building v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Socci v. StoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Sussman v. HendricksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986