Legal Opinion
BHS LAW LLP v. SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 3, 2026No. 5:25-cv-10541Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BHS LAW LLP, Case No. 25-cv-10541-NW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 10 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY, et al., Re: ECF No. 21 Defendants. 11 12 13 On February 9, 2026, Plaintiff Bhs Law LLP (“Plaintiff” or “Bhs”) filed a motion for a 14 preliminary injunction. ECF No. 21.1 Having considered the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal 15 authority, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), 16 VACATES the hearing set for April 15, 2026, and DENIES the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC v. Florida Entertainment Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. SpitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.