Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lamkin v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 17, 1896No. 203PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Memorandum.— Original proceeding in quo warranto brought by The State on the relation of A. W. Lamkin, county attorney of Stevens county, Kansas, against John S. Kelly, to oust him from 'the office of treasurer of said Stevens county.

Read the full summary

Memorandum.— Original proceeding in quo warranto brought by The State on the relation of A. W. Lamkin, county attorney of Stevens county, Kansas, against John S. Kelly, to oust him from 'the office of treasurer of said Stevens county. The statement of the case, as made by Johnson, P. J., is as follows : On the 9th day of September, 1895, an original petition. was filed in the office of the clerk of the court of appeals, southern department, western division, at Garden City, Finney county, Kansas, by A. W. Lam-kin, county attorney of Stevens county, Kansas, which petition is as follows : “ Now…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, P. J. :

The first contention of counsel for the defendant under his demurrer is, that the courts of appeals have no jurisdiction in quo warranto proceedings. In the consideration of this objection it is necessary to consider the source from which the jurisdiction of this court is derived. Some of the courts of this state derive their existence directly from the constitution, which expressly defines and limits their jurisdiction and makes the jurisdiction within these limits exclusive, and provides also that they shall possess such other and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Judd v. DriverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  3. State ex rel. Keeler v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  4. State v. MajorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Corley v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API