Legal Opinion
Salem Blue Collar Workers Ass'n v. City of Salem
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 13, 1993No. Civ. 92-1137PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, Chief Judge.
This lawsuit challenges the City of Salem’s municipal residency ordinance, which requires city employees to reside in the city. Plaintiffs claim that this ordinance violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV of the United States Constitution in addition to various other provisions of the United States and New Jersey Constitutions. Plaintiffs are the Salem Blue Collar Workers Association, the collective bargaining agent for blue collar and clerical workers employed by the City of Salem, and Stephen Scull, a laborer for the City and member of the union…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salem Blue Collar Workers Ass'n v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Stevenson v. Town of Oyster BayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Salem Blue Collar Workers Association v. City Of SalemCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994