Legal Opinion

State v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 19, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Izlar, J., Anderson, February, 1893. This was an appeal from an order directing the trial of J. Mims Sullivan to be had in Anderson County. The State moved to dismiss the appeal, upon which motion the following order was passed April 24, 1893, Per Curiam.

Read the full summary

Before Izlar, J., Anderson, February, 1893. This was an appeal from an order directing the trial of J. Mims Sullivan to be had in Anderson County. The State moved to dismiss the appeal, upon which motion the following order was passed April 24, 1893, Per Curiam. This is a motion to dismiss the appeal taken by the defendant “from the order and rulings of his honor, Judge Izlar, made on the 13th and 14th days of February, 1893, upon the ground that said appeal is premature and cannot be heard, as no final judgment has been rendered in the cause;” and also a motion to vacate and set aside an…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Pope.

There was a preliminary question raised in this case by the motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that under the laws of this commonwealth regulating appeals in criminal cases, an appeal to this court does not lie against any interlocutory order of the Court of General Sessions, but that such appeal must wait until after final judgment. This court, by its order dated April 24th, 1893, directed that this motion be considered along with the questions involved in the appeal itself, to be heard on the 26th May, 1.893.

Th…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ManningSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. Sidney Moorer (2)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API