Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Duke

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided December 19, 1995No. Civ. PB-C-95-473PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EISELE, District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiff William Richmond’s pro se complaint (Docket No. 3), which seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs complaint has been referred to a United States Magistrate, 1 see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); E.D.Ark. Rule F-1(VIII)(A)(8), who has since presented the Court with his proposed Findings and Recommendation (Docket No. 4), recommending that plaintiffs complaint be dismissed without prejudice under the authority of Heck v. Humphrey, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). Defendants have filed no…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bohanan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Bohanan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Gardner v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022
  4. Gardner v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021
  5. Mitchell v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API