Bohanan v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurrence
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
L. Brown, Justice. I cannot disagree that our recent gree that our recent cases that touch and concern Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.1 indicate that physical custody is a prerequisite to petitioning for relief. This is so even though Rule 37.1 merely uses the term “custody” and does not distinguish between legal custody or physical custody.
I am mindful, however, that in this case where parole is the issue, the order of conditional release makes reference to the fact that the respondent, Bohanan, is still in legal custody. This would be sufficient custody for postconviction…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Elbert Whaley Jones v. Gary Jerrison, Parole Officer Cranston Mitchell, Board of Probation and Parole and the Attorney General of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Richmond v. DukeDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995