Legal Opinion
The Bank of Columbia v. George Sweeny
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 10, 1828PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
26 U.S. 567
1 Pet. 567
7 L.Ed. 265
THE BANK OF COLUMBIA
v.
GEORGE SWEENY.
January Term, 1828
Messrs. Jones and Key, moved the Court for a mandamus to be directed to the Circuit Court of the United States, for the county of Washington, in the District of Columbia; commanding them to have a certain issue joined, which issue had been tendered in a proceeding in that Court against George Sweeny, and in which the Bank of Columbia were plaintiffs. George Sweeny being indebted to the Bank of Columbia, upon a promissory note, the President of the bank, in conformity with the provisions of the statute of…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Marshall.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bank of Columbia v. SweenySupreme Court of the United States · 1828
3Cited by37 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.