Legal Opinion

People v. Pless

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying him an opportunity to participate in the formulation of responses to two written inquiries from the jury during deliberations is not preserved for our review (see, People v Starling, 85 NY2d 509, 516). The first note from the jury was marked as an exhibit and read aloud in defendant’s presence, and defendant did not object upon being informed of the court’s intended response (see, People v Rivera, 233 AD2d 344, lv denied 89 NY2d 946). Although the court did not seek input from defense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. StarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. TraitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. DePilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. FontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API