Christensen v. Epley
Oregon Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceTongue, J.
Because this court is equally divided upon the question whether the Court of Appeals should be affirmed or reversed in its holding that the trial court erred in sustaining defendants’ demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, the majority of the court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served for this court, as a court, to issue any opinion on this question.
Because of the nature and importance of this question, however, my brothers Peterson and Holman and I are of the opinion that the publication of our respective and opposing views on this question may well serve some useful purpose for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Williams v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.