McKenzie v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
Travis McKenzie was convicted after a jury trial of trafficking in cocaine. He contends the evidence was insufficient. Because the evidence was sufficient, we affirm.
On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. We do not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility, but only determine if the evidence was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt.
So viewed, the evidence showed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Renner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sherrer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.