Campbell v. Mickelson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
From the finding quoted, which is the only finding of fact made in regard to the fraudulent character of the conveyance, it is impossible to tell upon what ground the trial court proceeded. Each of the defendants testified to the $1,200 transaction in 1916. There was no contradiction of this evidence except such as might be inferred from the circumstances. The trial court does not find that the loan was not made. The trial court may have been of the view that the loan having been made in 1916, no precise time having been agreed upon for repayment, it was payable on demand, and therefore…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Brader v. BraderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Fawcett v. FawcettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Milwaukee v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Holz & Holz, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Aus v. CarperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Bramsher v. ZahnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Matter of ZahnDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
- Bramsher v. ZahnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979