Bailey v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Candler, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) By the admission of a prima facie case in favor of the propounder, the caveators assumed the burden of proving that the paper sought to be propounded was not entitled to probate because of mental incapacity of the testator or undue influence exercised over the mind of the testator by the propounder and Annie B. Wood. Our first inquiry must therefore be directed to the evidence introduced by the caveators to determine whether they have carried the burden of establishing the invalidity of the will on these grounds. First, on the issue of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. BuffingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- DeNieff v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Brumbelow v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Hill v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Spivey v. SpiveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Morgan v. IveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Allen v. HeysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Kellar v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959