State v. Cater
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Lirm District Court. — Milo P. Smith, Judge. Upon an information filed in the superior court of Cedar Rapids, the defendant was convicted of violating a certain city ordinance. From the judgment entered in that proceeding, , he appealed to the district court, where he was again tried and again convicted, and he brings the case by further appeal to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
The ordinance with violation of which the defendant is charged, provides as follows:
1. criminal Law: intent. “Section 884. Transient Merchants — Itinerant Vendors. — 16. Transient merchants or itiner ant vendors shall be construed to mean and include all persons, principal or agent, who engage in a temporary or transient merchandise business in the city of Cedar Rapids and including those who, for the purpose of carrying on such business, hire, lease, or occupy any building, structure or railroad car for the exhibition and sale of such goods, wares and merchandise, shall pay a license fee of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City National Bank of Columbus v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Harrison v. McKimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Zimmerman v. BrannonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Larson v. ThomaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Chas. Counselman & Co. v. ReichartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Bakeries Co. v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- American Bakeries Co. v. City of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934