Legal Opinion
Superlube, Inc. of Camdenton v. Innovative Real Estate, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 2004No. 26060, 26077PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
Superlube, Inc. of Camdenton and Ronald E. Adamson (“Appellants”) obtained a permanent injunction preventing Innova tive Real Estate, Inc. (“Innovative”) from blocking ingress and egress along an existing driveway to Superlube’s place of business, pursuant to an amended easement agreement entered into between the parties. 1 The trial court denied Appellants’ request for damages and attorney’s fees. Appellants appeal the denial of their claim for damages and attorney’s fees. Innovative also appeals, alleging the trial court erred in granting the permanent injunction.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Creech v. NoyesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Asbury v. Crawford Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Allen v. G & J EnterprisesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Wall USA, Inc. v. City of BallwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Eggemeyer v. ConnollyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Value Lumber Co. v. JeltenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Carpenter v. CarpenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- DiSalvo Properties, LLC v. Deborah B. Purvis, Elizabeth E. Nolan, NIS Construction Services, LLC and Jennings Station Crossing, LLC, and Gary L. Hall, Bentley Investments of Nevada, LLC, and Penfield's Business Centers, LLC, Defendants/Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- J.M.Z. v. D.L.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018