Charles Mitchael v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge.
In the Eighth Circuit, dual status National Guard technicians who apply for Social Security benefits after February 3, 2011, are able to take advantage of our decision in Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir.2011) to avoid application of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). Plaintiffs are seeking to represent a class of dual status National Gúard technicians who had their benefits determined prior to the issuance of the Petersen decision and would like to have their benefits readjusted to take advantage of the decision. The district court 1 dismissed their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- RANDALL D. WOLCOTT, MD, PA v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Halvorson v. United StatesUnited States District Court · 2019
- Alexander v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
- Ali Dorobati v. Eric Gaudiosi, Deputy Chief of Mission, U.S. Embassy in the United Arab EmiratesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026
- Anderson v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- B. Roka and S. Khatri v. Kristi Noem, et al.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.