State Ex Rel. Lafollette v. Hinkle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
By tbis procedure tbe relators seek a writ of mandate probibiting tbe secretary of state from certifying to tbe proper officers of tbe state tbe names of persons nominated to fill various state offices (but not presidential electors), such nominations being made by the “LaFollette State Party.” The petition alleges that Mr. LaFollette appears as an individual and as an independent candidate, under the party name “Progressive Party,” for the presidency of the United States, and that the other relators are qualified voters and taxpayers of this state and are the duly organized and acting…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Brown v. McQuadeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Townsend Gas & Electric Light Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Harris v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. Gillette v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- State ex rel. Godfrey v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Michael S. Virgil, AKA Mike Virgil v. Time, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Senior Citizens League, Inc. v. Department of Social SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1951
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.