Ivey v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
1. “ ‘To sustain a conviction [of a felony] upon the testimony of an accomplice, there must be corroborating circumstances which, in themselves and independently of the testimony of the accomplice directly connect the defendant with the crime, or lead to the inference that he is guilty (italics ours).’ Childers v. State, 52 Ga. 106; Baker v. State, 14 Ga. App. 578 (4), 585 (80 S. E. 805); Stokes v. State, 19 Ga. App. 235, 238 (91 S. E. 271). Facts which create merely a grave suspicion of the defendant’s guilt are insufficient to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice (McCalla v. State,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Childers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Baker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- McCalla v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Stokes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quaid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Buxton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988