King v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Conviction for assault to murder; punishment, eight years in the penitentiary.
Complaint is made in bill of exception No. 6 of the refusal of a special charge, in substance, that a conviction for assault to murder could not be had unless the jury believed the assault was made with malice. This again raises the question as to whether malice or malice aforethought is an element necessary to prove or submit in the charge in trials for assault to murder. We say again, — because the same question was raised in Tucker’s case, 115 Texas Crim. Rep., 41, 26 S. W. (2d) 638, — that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Crutchfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Whiteside v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lydia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Finley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Friday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Friday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.