Legal Opinion

Thibault v. DeVio

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an action of contract to recover for services rendered by the plaintiff to a Miss Dudley, the defendant’s testate, late of Worcester, from 1912 to 1942. The answer was a general denial. The jury returned a verdict for .the plaintiff for $335. No exception was taken to the instructions given as to the measure of damages, but the defendant excepted to the refusal of a request for a. ruling that damages in excess of nominal damages could not be awarded because there was no evidence of the value of the plaintiff’s services.

*606The jury could find that Miss Dudley had submitted to an operation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Rizzo v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Parker v. LevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. McGarrahan v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. BunarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Mailhiot v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  3. Carter v. Empire Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  4. Hurwitz v. Parkway Country Club, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Cushman v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API