Ohio v. Carder

This ease was argued before this court last

spring. However, since a question was raised as to the applicability of the doctrine of Escobedo v. Illinois (378 U. S. 478, 12 *4L. Ed. 2d 977, 84 S. Ct. 1758) to this case, the court decided to delay its decision until the determinations by the Supreme Court of the United States of the cases of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, and Johnson v. New Jersey, 16 L. Ed. 2d 882. The case was reassigned for further argument this fall in the light of the Miranda and Johnson decisions.

Defendant’s primary contention relates to the…