Legal Opinion

In Re Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1925No. 19103. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

Roslyn School District No. 24, being desirous of raising additional revenue by taxation for school purposes, made application to the county superintendent to annex certain portions of School District No. 28. On the hearing before the superintendent, an order was made changing the boundaries of Districts No. 24 and 28 in conformity with the petition. An appeal was taken to the superior court, where, upon trial de novo, the order of the superintendent was reversed. School District No. 24 has appealed.

The first contention made by appellant is that there is no appeal from the order of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Leighty v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People ex rel. Vick v. KirkhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Bouffleur v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chicago B. & Q. R. v. Byron School Dist. No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Heaton v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Merritt School District No. 50 v. KimmWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. School District No. 88 v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Malaga School District No. 115 v. KinkadeWashington Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API