Legal Opinion

Jones v. County of Los Angeles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2015No. 12-55995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:

The Jones family — Jill, Michael, and their son G.J. — brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Dr. Claudia Wang violated their Fourth- and Fourteenth Amendment rights and committed various torts during her investigation into whether G.J. had been abused. The district court denied Dr. Wang summary judgment on her qualified immunity defense. We conclude that, resolving all factual disputes in the Joneses’ favor, the alleged conduct of Dr. Wang can support a claim that Dr. Wang violated the Joneses’' clearly established constitutional rights.

I.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rabinovitz v. City of L. A.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  2. Thomas v. CannonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
  3. Santos v. Kisco Senior Living, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Dees v. Cnty. of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  5. Jones v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API