Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 2002No. CA CR 01-950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellants, Sharon and Robert Gilmore, were arrested in the Wal-Mart parking lot after buying various items including three packages of antihistamines, four cans of starter fluid, some butane, and an air freshener. A search of their car revealed four more packages of antihistamines and some butane tanks. After a jury trial, they were convicted of possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, and sentenced to respective terms of five years and fifteen years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. From those convictions, comes this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ravellette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Crutchfield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Knight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cluck v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Cluck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Cluck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API